I notice this statement : Completion of the C. elegans genome sequence in 1998 demonstrated that almost all gene families involved in neuron function in mammals are present in the worm.
Does anyone know what sources he used to draw this conclusion?
I guess you mean…what source is Jean-Louis Bessereau using when he states that 'almost all gene families involved in neuron function in mammals are present in the worm.
'?
Well, given it’s his area of interest and he has probably studied which neuron- related gene families are present…then it’s not a great leap of the imagination to think he probably conceived the sentence himself :-\
Thanks for your response. Sorry that I didn’t make myself clear. Your guess is right about my question. I don’t know how he came to such conclusion as he didn’t refer to any article.
It’s common to find on lab websites or Faculty pages, narrative descriptions of research. For example, the website for the David H Fitch lab (as they are currently posting on the forum and do some very nice work):
Their research is described elegantly, without being peppered with journal references (which are to hand should you ask the question, ‘how does he know that?’.
I cannot find this link and the statement anymore:
link http://www.biologie.ens.fr/bcsgnce/spip.php?article2
statement : Completion of the C. elegans genome sequence in 1998 demonstrated that almost all gene families involved in neuron function in mammals are present in the worm.
In the yet to come WS247 version of WormBase, 9.518 out of 20.395 protein coding C.elegans genes will have predicted human orthologs.
So I would assume if you extend it to all mammals and gene families instead of single genes, at the very least you could do an “the majority of gene families is conserved in mammals” statement.
as quick and dirty approach: there are 13 genes with GO:0048666 neuron development, of which 10 have orthologs in human.
disclaimer: if you include the descendants of the term the percentage might be higher (or lower)